Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Artemis Console next gen based on hawtIO 4 #5467

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

andytaylor
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@andytaylor andytaylor marked this pull request as draft January 23, 2025 14:42
@andytaylor andytaylor force-pushed the console-upgrade branch 4 times, most recently from d6d03ac to bbcd1d4 Compare January 29, 2025 15:59
@andytaylor andytaylor force-pushed the console-upgrade branch 3 times, most recently from 9bdb0a1 to 9935414 Compare February 3, 2025 11:22
@andytaylor andytaylor marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2025 11:23
@andytaylor andytaylor force-pushed the console-upgrade branch 3 times, most recently from 0c0edfd to 200a471 Compare February 4, 2025 11:43
@gemmellr
Copy link
Member

gemmellr commented Feb 6, 2025

Another thought, the documentation has a small section about the console, which probably needs a little refresh: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/2.39.0/docs/user-manual/management-console.adoc

@andytaylor andytaylor force-pushed the console-upgrade branch 2 times, most recently from ce54ab6 to e9eee15 Compare February 10, 2025 11:55
@andytaylor
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another thought, the documentation has a small section about the console, which probably needs a little refresh: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/2.39.0/docs/user-manual/management-console.adoc

I have updated the console docs content and images

@gemmellr
Copy link
Member

I rebased the PR following all the recent PRs so we can better check against the current state, and included a few small fixups.

@jbertram
Copy link
Contributor

@gemmellr, how close is this to merging?

@gemmellr
Copy link
Member

Should be very close. Some final review (note: other reviewers are available :P). Could do with another rebase at this point. Commit details could do with updating (e.g: git commit --amend --reset-author). Needs a Jira.

@jbertram
Copy link
Contributor

I created ARTEMIS-5319 for this. @andytaylor, can you update the commit message with this?

@jbertram jbertram added the for-2.40.0 needed for 2.40.0 label Feb 23, 2025
@jbertram
Copy link
Contributor

FYI - We almost certainly will need to update the security-keycloak example with new instructions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
for-2.40.0 needed for 2.40.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants