test(store): SS Raw Benchmarks

[alexanderbez]

Description

Raw benchmarks, i.e. benchmarks of raw API calls against each SS backend engine.

$ nix develop
<nix-shell> $ go test -tags rocksdb -benchmem -benchtime=5s -run=^$ -bench ^Benchmark ./store/storage/ -v

https://pastebin.com/raw/q5LhTcRy

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• run make lint and make test
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[yihuang]

BTW, the esasist way for me to setup rocksdb to run the test is:

$ nix develop
<nix-shell> $ go test -tags rocksdb -benchmem -benchtime=5s -run=^$ -bench ^Benchmark ./store/storage/ -v

[alexanderbez]

So neat @yihuang! I really need to spend more time playing with nix and getting to know it. Thanks for sharing. I'll use this going forward as it's much easier!

[yihuang]

why do we keep the btree prefix to the sqlite, but no lsm prefix to the other dbs?

[alexanderbez]

My intention was to indicate that it's not a direct BTree implementation, but rather an existing storage engine that utilizes BTrees under the hood.

I can add the type to all of them if you'd like.

[yihuang]

I mean we are just benchmarking sqlite, not btree, and we can't simply benchmark btree without referring to a specific implementation, and there are so many design decisions a db implementation need to make.

[cool-develope]

LGTM, just curious about the result