Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[linux-6.6.y] pinctrl: Add support Zhaoxin GPIO pinctrl #275

Merged

Conversation

leoliu-oc
Copy link
Contributor

zhaoxin inclusion
category: feature


Implements gpio interrupt and gpio management functions and provides standard pinctrl and gpio interfaces.

zhaoxin inclusion
category: feature

--------------------

Implements gpio interrupt and gpio management functions and provides
standard pinctrl and gpio interfaces.

Signed-off-by: leoliu-oc <[email protected]>
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @leoliu-oc. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a deepin-community member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@leoliu-oc leoliu-oc changed the title pinctrl: Add support Zhaoxin GPIO pinctrl [linux-6.6.y] pinctrl: Add support Zhaoxin GPIO pinctrl Jun 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@opsiff opsiff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test
/lgtm

@opsiff opsiff merged commit 2871a86 into deepin-community:linux-6.6.y Jun 19, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

zhaoxin-pinctrl: Add support for PM_SLEEP

This patch adds support for PM_SLEEP in zhaoxin-pinctrl driver.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: opsiff
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign yukarichiba for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Avenger-285714 pushed a commit to Avenger-285714/DeepinKernel that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2024
commit 15fffc6a5624b13b428bb1c6e9088e32a55eb82c upstream.

uevent_show() wants to de-reference dev->driver->name. There is no clean
way for a device attribute to de-reference dev->driver unless that
attribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the
anti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks
deadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding
the lock.

This deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock()
is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a
local lockdep key for @Dev->mutex to reveal reports of the form:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.10.0-rc7+ deepin-community#275 Tainted: G           OE    N
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff8c2270070de0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8c22016e88f8 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}:
        __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30
        uevent_show+0xac/0x130
        dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40
        sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0
        seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450
        vfs_read+0x25b/0x340
        ksys_read+0x67/0xf0
        do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -> #0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0
        lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0
        kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200
        __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220
        kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0
        device_del+0x168/0x410
        device_unregister+0x13/0x60
        devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110
        device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70
        device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210
        driver_detach+0x47/0x90
        bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0
        cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260
        do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

The observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer
lived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless
de-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a
device. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use
synchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential
races.  It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to
handle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.

Thanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].

Fixes: c0a40097f0bc ("drivers: core: synchronize really_probe() and dev_uevent()")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/[email protected] [1]
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Ashish Sangwan <[email protected]>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Cc: Dirk Behme <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/172081332794.577428.9738802016494057132.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Avenger-285714 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2024
commit 15fffc6a5624b13b428bb1c6e9088e32a55eb82c upstream.

uevent_show() wants to de-reference dev->driver->name. There is no clean
way for a device attribute to de-reference dev->driver unless that
attribute is defined via (struct device_driver).dev_groups. Instead, the
anti-pattern of taking the device_lock() in the attribute handler risks
deadlocks with code paths that remove device attributes while holding
the lock.

This deadlock is typically invisible to lockdep given the device_lock()
is marked lockdep_set_novalidate_class(), but some subsystems allocate a
local lockdep key for @Dev->mutex to reveal reports of the form:

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.10.0-rc7+ #275 Tainted: G           OE    N
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/2374 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff8c2270070de0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}, at: __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8c22016e88f8 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x39/0x210

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (&cxl_root_key){+.+.}-{3:3}:
        __mutex_lock+0x99/0xc30
        uevent_show+0xac/0x130
        dev_attr_show+0x18/0x40
        sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xac/0xf0
        seq_read_iter+0x110/0x450
        vfs_read+0x25b/0x340
        ksys_read+0x67/0xf0
        do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 -> #0 (kn->active#6){++++}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x121a/0x1fa0
        lock_acquire+0xd6/0x2e0
        kernfs_drain+0x1e9/0x200
        __kernfs_remove+0xde/0x220
        kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x5e/0xa0
        device_del+0x168/0x410
        device_unregister+0x13/0x60
        devres_release_all+0xb8/0x110
        device_unbind_cleanup+0xe/0x70
        device_release_driver_internal+0x1c7/0x210
        driver_detach+0x47/0x90
        bus_remove_driver+0x6c/0xf0
        cxl_acpi_exit+0xc/0x11 [cxl_acpi]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x181/0x260
        do_syscall_64+0x75/0x190
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

The observation though is that driver objects are typically much longer
lived than device objects. It is reasonable to perform lockless
de-reference of a @driver pointer even if it is racing detach from a
device. Given the infrequency of driver unregistration, use
synchronize_rcu() in module_remove_driver() to close any potential
races.  It is potentially overkill to suffer synchronize_rcu() just to
handle the rare module removal racing uevent_show() event.

Thanks to Tetsuo Handa for the debug analysis of the syzbot report [1].

Fixes: c0a40097f0bc ("drivers: core: synchronize really_probe() and dev_uevent()")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <[email protected]>
Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/[email protected] [1]
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Ashish Sangwan <[email protected]>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Cc: Dirk Behme <[email protected]>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/172081332794.577428.9738802016494057132.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants