-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[automated] Merge branch 'release/5.0' => 'master' #26767
[automated] Merge branch 'release/5.0' => 'master' #26767
Conversation
…1009.6 (dotnet#26755) [release/5.0] Update dependencies from dotnet/runtime
…009.3 (dotnet#26764) [release/5.0] Update dependencies from dotnet/efcore
…ysis and HeaderPropagation (dotnet#26720)
dd002ce
to
ff6d198
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto-approving branch merge.
Hello @msftbot[bot]! Because this pull request has the Do note that I've been instructed to only help merge pull requests of this repository that have been opened for at least 60 minutes. No worries though, I will be back when the time is right! 😉 p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (
|
…1010.7 (dotnet#26792) [release/5.0] Update dependencies from dotnet/runtime
…6797) * !!! Correct condition controlling `public` API analysis !!! - dotnet#26785 demonstrated analyzers were inoperable * Remove unused `public` API files * Update `public` API files - three Components files were missing `#nullable enable` - `nullable` annotations missing or out-of-date elsewhere * Ignore `public` API files completely during source build - do not warn about unused files * Update more `public` API files
…012.2 (dotnet#26816) Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools , dotnet-ef , Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore , Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design , Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.InMemory , Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational , Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Sqlite , Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer From Version 5.0.0-rtm.20509.3 -> To Version 5.0.0 Co-authored-by: dotnet-maestro[bot] <dotnet-maestro[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- remove `$(DisableServicingFeatures)` property; `$(IsServicingBuild)` works now
1b59ce2
to
16543d4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good but you or @TanayParikh will need to open this branch and use VS to add the new members to the API baseline files.
Or, @Pilchie should we remove the baseline files from 'master' until much later in the release❔
I’d prefer to keep them through the release so that we are more aware of when API surface area changes, though we should move the 5.0 APIs to the “Shipped” files. |
e81582d
to
461bdcc
Compare
Soon 😺 |
I'm working through applying the analyzer suggestions using VS, but it's unbelievably slow. I'm going to try it on my office workstation to see if that helps but I'm not very hopeful. Is there any way to mass apply suggestions for "RS0036" analyzer suggestions without VS? |
Personally, I open the smallest containing |
461bdcc
to
c074c85
Compare
c074c85
to
41246b0
Compare
A commandline way of applying the fixes is a feature request, but I don't think it exists yet, right @mavasani ? |
That is correct, it has still not been implemented. Tagging @mikadumont @vatsalyaagrawal |
I went ahead and created an issue to be tracked here dotnet/roslyn#48561 |
@dotnet/aspnet-build updated with the additional public api annotations, and now passing CI. Any objections in merging? |
@TanayParikh no objection from me. I'm surprised the |
Tagging @pranavkm to take a look. Looks like a lot of these changes are to go from null-oblivious to null-annotated. Is that expected? Did we do more nullable work in master? Did a new arcade change a setting here or something? |
We made changes to use nullable on generic type parameters late in 5.0. The changes make sense. |
Thanks all, merging. |
I detected changes in the release/5.0 branch which have not been merged yet to master. I'm a robot and am configured to help you automatically keep master up to date, so I've opened this PR.
This PR merges commits made on release/5.0 by the following committers:
Instructions for merging from UI
This PR will not be auto-merged. When pull request checks pass, complete this PR by creating a merge commit, not a squash or rebase commit.
If this repo does not allow creating merge commits from the GitHub UI, use command line instructions.
Instructions for merging via command line
Run these commands to merge this pull request from the command line.
or if you are using SSH
After PR checks are complete push the branch
Instructions for resolving conflicts
Instructions for updating this pull request
Contributors to this repo have permission update this pull request by pushing to the branch 'merge/release/5.0-to-master'. This can be done to resolve conflicts or make other changes to this pull request before it is merged.
or if you are using SSH
Contact .NET Core Engineering if you have questions or issues.
Also, if this PR was generated incorrectly, help us fix it. See https://github.com/dotnet/arcade/blob/master/scripts/GitHubMergeBranches.ps1.