You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
📝 The potential increase in false positives for this rule is unknown. However, the ability to use var _ = to explicitly ignore such return values could compensate for the higher rate of reports.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
* master:
Sorted usings
Change the allowed version range for Microsoft.CodeAnalysis to [2.0.*-2.3.0) as we are still on the 2.0.0 packages of Microsoft.CodeAnalysis
Verify IOperation API version in analyzer packages
Update tests for new CA1052 assumption
CA1052 ignore any classes that implement an interface.
Fixed resource namespaces
Refactored Microsoft.NetCore.Analyzers
Refactored Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers
Fixed ca1812 to work for generic classes.
Bump up prerelease version
Fix broken hyperlink
Update Versioning.md
Fixed links in README
Put CPS guid in sln to bypass selector
Consider pure functions as part of CA1806. Fixesdotnet#1164.
Analyzer package
Example: Microsoft.CodeQuality.Analyzers
Analyzer
CA1806 (Do not ignore method results)
Repro steps
[Pure]
and returns a valueExpected behavior
CA1806 could be reported.
Actual behavior
CA1806 is not reported.
📝 The potential increase in false positives for this rule is unknown. However, the ability to use
var _ =
to explicitly ignore such return values could compensate for the higher rate of reports.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: