Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: allow customizing cluster domain #1031

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2022
Merged

fix: allow customizing cluster domain #1031

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2022

Conversation

aslafy-z
Copy link
Collaborator

@aslafy-z aslafy-z commented Jun 8, 2022

Q A
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
API breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Related tickets fixes #1021
License Apache 2.0

What's in this PR?

Enable users to customize cluster domain

Checklist

To Do

  • If the PR is not complete but you want to discuss the approach, list what remains to be done here

@aslafy-z aslafy-z changed the title feat: allow customizing cluster domain fix: allow customizing cluster domain Jun 8, 2022
@siliconbrain
Copy link
Contributor

I'm only vaguely familiar with how DNS resolution works when the cluster domain is not specified. I know it works in most cases, but I'm sure there are some edge cases e.g. maybe with a service mesh (e.g. Istio) or other multi-cluster setup.

Also, the trailing dot that we leave in the generated domain name if cluster domain is defined as "" might be problematic.

@aslafy-z aslafy-z marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2022 11:08
@aslafy-z aslafy-z force-pushed the aslafy-z-patch-1 branch 2 times, most recently from db08a05 to 116af7a Compare July 31, 2022 11:17
@aslafy-z aslafy-z requested review from ahma and siliconbrain July 31, 2022 11:18
@aslafy-z aslafy-z force-pushed the aslafy-z-patch-1 branch 3 times, most recently from b31b213 to 53a529b Compare July 31, 2022 11:27
@aslafy-z aslafy-z force-pushed the aslafy-z-patch-1 branch 3 times, most recently from 7a727c6 to 549a1d9 Compare September 7, 2022 15:40
ahma
ahma previously approved these changes Sep 7, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@ahma ahma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine to me, Thanks @aslafy-z

@ahma ahma requested review from tarokkk, bshifter and siliconbrain and removed request for siliconbrain September 7, 2022 20:42
@aslafy-z aslafy-z force-pushed the aslafy-z-patch-1 branch 2 times, most recently from b73b12e to d87bd2e Compare September 9, 2022 17:14
@aslafy-z
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aslafy-z commented Sep 9, 2022

@siliconbrain I think I addresses all the comments you left. Please have another check.

ahma
ahma previously approved these changes Sep 11, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@ahma ahma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ahma ahma requested review from siliconbrain and removed request for siliconbrain September 11, 2022 18:35
Copy link
Contributor

@siliconbrain siliconbrain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@ahma ahma self-requested a review September 14, 2022 14:43
@ahma ahma merged commit 7653318 into master Sep 14, 2022
@aslafy-z aslafy-z deleted the aslafy-z-patch-1 branch September 14, 2022 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cluster name is hardcoded as cluster.local
3 participants