Use adjusted difficulty for trees in active transactions #1810
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* add adjusted difficulty calculation * make list of dependent blocks in election
SergiySW
added
the
functionality quality improvements
cryptocode
approved these changes
Mar 14, 2019
argakiig
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2019
wezrule
suggested changes
Mar 21, 2019
wezrule
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2019
guilhermelawless
pushed a commit
to guilhermelawless/nano-node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2019
…y#1810) * Use adjusted difficulty for trees in active transactions * add adjusted difficulty calculation * make list of dependent blocks in election * Adjust difficulty for dependent on deleted blocks elections * Potential overflow check * Using reference to items in remaining_blocks * correct words * Replace push_back with emplace_back for deque of pairs
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Better alternative to #1691