-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP/RFC] .parcelignore #448
[WIP/RFC] .parcelignore #448
Conversation
Add new improvements
Add all new commits
new features
Good questions! Also related: #474. Not sure I have the answers yet. I think we need a bit more input from others on how this should work. On your second point, I don't think I'd do this in |
I would like to discuss this in the context of a more complete ( |
Hello, Any ideas when can i expect parcelignore "miracle"? |
In my case(#357) I wanted to ignore certain sections, not the whole file itself 😅, would that be possible with this PR? |
A central use case would be to link from your HTML to a legacy entry point. Let's say you have a nice static website up and running with parceljs but you would like to link to your crazy old PHP3 system located at I suggest adding |
In my case I'm using Firebase hosting, and want to use their special urls to load the firebase api. Would be nice to have a |
@DeMoorJasper any inputs to why this got rejected? |
@mathiasrw I just closed it due to inactivity if parcelignore ever gets approved i’ll just make a new pr Sent with GitHawk |
+1 on special URLs used by Firebase |
Would like to see this reopened. Here's a PERFECT use case for it: moment/moment#2517 (comment) |
Please do not comment on an old closed PR, open up a new issue instead. |
So i gave
.parcelignore
a shot because it's been requested in some issues.Some questions
Currently i'm having issues by not wanting to read the.parcelignore
synchronous and seeing that all getDependencies/addDependency logic is synchronous, so if i would change it into an asynchronous function I would change a lot of core logic which is not really a good idea I think. Is there a better way to handle this or should i write.parcelignore
logic to be synchronous?Progress:
Find the best way to alter getDependenciesShould end up in the resolverrelated #141 #357 #333