Skip to content

Actions: sagemath/sage

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
114,426 workflow runs
114,426 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

Synchronize labels Synchronize labels #49767: submitted by kwankyu
February 23, 2025 21:12 2s
February 23, 2025 21:12 2s
Synchronize labels Synchronize labels #49766: submitted by kwankyu
February 23, 2025 21:11 2s
February 23, 2025 21:11 2s
Synchronize labels Synchronize labels #49765: submitted by kwankyu
February 23, 2025 21:11 3s
February 23, 2025 21:11 3s
Synchronize labels Synchronize labels #49764: submitted by kwankyu
February 23, 2025 21:07 2s
February 23, 2025 21:07 2s
Synchronize labels Synchronize labels #49763: submitted by kwankyu
February 23, 2025 21:06 2s
February 23, 2025 21:06 2s
Synchronize labels Synchronize labels #49762: submitted by kwankyu
February 23, 2025 21:04 2s
February 23, 2025 21:04 2s
Synchronize labels Synchronize labels #49761: submitted by kwankyu
February 23, 2025 20:57 2s
February 23, 2025 20:57 2s
Fixes error causing period function in BinaryRecurrenceSequence to stall and added enhancement Synchronize labels #49760: Pull request #39546 labeled by DaveWitteMorris
February 23, 2025 19:11 2s
February 23, 2025 19:11 2s
Fixes error causing period function in BinaryRecurrenceSequence to stall and added enhancement Synchronize labels #49759: Pull request #39546 unlabeled by DaveWitteMorris
February 23, 2025 19:11 2s
February 23, 2025 19:11 2s
Synchronize labels Synchronize labels #49758: Scheduled
February 23, 2025 18:06 14s develop
develop
February 23, 2025 18:06 14s
Publish documentation Publish documentation #17910: completed by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:42 3s
February 23, 2025 17:42 3s
Fixed issue causing logarithm of base 0 to not give either of the possible correct answers. Synchronize labels #49757: Pull request #39547 labeled by S17A05
February 23, 2025 17:17 2s
February 23, 2025 17:17 2s
Fixed issue causing logarithm of base 0 to not give either of the possible correct answers. Synchronize labels #49756: Pull request #39547 unlabeled by S17A05
February 23, 2025 17:17 2s
February 23, 2025 17:17 2s
Bump pillow and cffi CI Linux incremental #5094: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 In progress dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
February 23, 2025 17:11 In progress
Bump pillow and cffi Build documentation (PDF) #13592: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 31m 16s dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
February 23, 2025 17:11 31m 16s
Bump pillow and cffi Build & Test using Meson #3034: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 40m 28s dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
February 23, 2025 17:11 40m 28s
Bump pillow and cffi Static check with Pyright #6751: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 7m 46s dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
February 23, 2025 17:11 7m 46s
Bump pillow and cffi Build & Test #18893: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 35m 6s dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
February 23, 2025 17:11 35m 6s
Bump pillow and cffi Build documentation #18924: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 30m 34s dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
February 23, 2025 17:11 30m 34s
Bump pillow and cffi Lint #18919: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 4m 49s dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
February 23, 2025 17:11 4m 49s
Bump pillow and cffi Build & Test using Conda #16580: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 57m 2s dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
dimpase:bump_pillow_and_cffi
February 23, 2025 17:11 57m 2s
Bump pillow and cffi Synchronize labels #49755: Pull request #39571 synchronize by dimpase
February 23, 2025 17:11 16s
February 23, 2025 17:11 16s
Fix k-distance dominating set for directed graphs by using the original graph instead of the reversed graph Static check with Pyright #6750: Pull request #39576 opened by lukefleed
February 23, 2025 16:16 Action required lukefleed:fix-k-dominating-set
lukefleed:fix-k-dominating-set
February 23, 2025 16:16 Action required
Fix k-distance dominating set for directed graphs by using the original graph instead of the reversed graph Build documentation (PDF) #13591: Pull request #39576 opened by lukefleed
February 23, 2025 16:16 Action required lukefleed:fix-k-dominating-set
lukefleed:fix-k-dominating-set
February 23, 2025 16:16 Action required
Fix k-distance dominating set for directed graphs by using the original graph instead of the reversed graph Build documentation #18923: Pull request #39576 opened by lukefleed
February 23, 2025 16:16 Action required lukefleed:fix-k-dominating-set
lukefleed:fix-k-dominating-set
February 23, 2025 16:16 Action required